Burning Question: Do Great Resumes Even Exist?

“Is there truly such a thing as a great resume — or are there only great candidates?”

Some may disagree, but I think this simple question has a lot of important layers bundled up in it, as well as some profound implications for today’s job hunters — many of whom continue to hold (in my opinion) an unhealthy and unrealistic view of the role that resumes play in the job search process.

So again, I’m just going to throw the question out there.  Have you ever seen “greatness” in a resume?  Have you ever hired somebody BECAUSE their resume was so wonderfully creative, attractive, or well put-together?  Or was your positive impression of a candidate mostly due, instead, to things like the relevance of the person’s employment titles to the job at hand, the reputation of their previous employers, and the impressiveness of their achievements to date?

I raise this issue because I’m constantly coming across job hunters who complain that “their resume isn’t working” or “their resume must not be very good” because it’s not generating very many (or any) interviews.  As a result of this concern, many frustrated professionals end up spending tons of time, and money, endlessly tweaking their resume in the hopes of improving their job search results.  Making matters worse, they often fall prey to the countless resume-writing services on the web that fan these flames and apply fear-based selling techniques to convince people they’ll never work again unless they pony up $399…0r $599…or $799 for a complete resume overhaul.

As a matter of fact, I received an e-mail recently that illustrates this very point.  After writing the resume for one of my outplacement clients several months ago, this person submitted her document to the website Jobfox.com and received a lengthy “complimentary critique” back from them that basically said her resume stunk and that she’d be a fool not to hire them to fix it.  Below are a few choice snippets from the 2,000-word formulaic critique they sent her.  I’d be happy to share the full review with anybody who might be interested in seeing it, but frankly, I suspect all you’d need to do is send Jobfox your own resume and you’d have a carbon-copy sent to you almost immediately.

Jobfox Review: “My first impression of you is that you have an impressive array of skills and experiences. You’re a qualified Executive Assistant Professional with a lot to offer an employer.  Now, here’s the bad news: your resume does not pass the 30 second test and the content is not up to the standards one would expect from a candidate like you.”

[Matt’s Comment: Oh really?  If the content is “not up” to current standards and the resume doesn’t pass the 3o-second test, then how exactly did the reader arrive at the impression that my client is such a “qualified” professional with “a lot to offer” an employer?]

Jobfox Review: “We’ve all been told that looks don’t matter as much as substance, but in the case of your resume this just isn’t true. I found your design to be simplistic. The appearance is not polished, and it doesn’t say “high potential Executive Assistant Professional.”

[Matt’s Comment: There’s that phrase “Executive Assistant Professional” again, which, when you think about it, doesn’t even really make sense or sound like proper English.  Hmmm.  Is anybody else starting to get the feeling that this might be an automated template where they just mail-merge a phrase from the top of each person’s resume into the letter, every once in a while, to try and make the critique sound more personalized?  Shame on my client for not working in a more mainstream field like Sales or Finance where the cookie-cutter template could just add “professional” after the phrase without it sounding silly!]

Jobfox Review: “The ideal resume design is airy, clean, and uncluttered…with the effective and strategic use of white space.”

[Matt’s Comment: Wait a minute.  Didn’t you just say, a moment ago, that my client’s resume was too “simplistic” to be effective?  And now you’re saying the best resumes are “clean and uncluttered” with lots of white space?  I’m struggling to understand the distinction here.  Should a good resume be long, complicated, and fancy-looking — or should it be simplistic?  I mean, my client is already using a one-page resume with plenty of white space and short phrases of bulleted text.  How does one get much more clean/uncluttered than that???]

Jobfox Review:”In conclusion, your resume is selling you short, and I recommend that you make the investment in having it professionally rewritten.  If your resume is not as strong as the top 10% then your chances of getting the interview are slim. In spite of your skills and experience, your resume will not compete well against a professionally written resume.  I hate to see a strong person like you being underserved by something that can be fixed.”

[Matt’s Comment: Lord, give me strength.  Did this “expert” reviewer really just wrap up the critique by informing my client that she’s a “strong person” and that she’d “hate to see her” not be more successful in her search?  Sorry, not buying it.  I think it takes a little more than an unsolicited resume review conducted via cyberspace to form such a deep emotional bond.  And by the way, how does this reviewer know that my client hasn‘t already had her resume professionally-written?  That’s a pretty bold (and in this case, wrong) assumption.  It really doesn’t matter, though.  It’s evident that nothing (not the truth, not rational thinking, not professional ethics) was going to stand in the way of this reviewer getting to the final pitch, where she hit my client up for $399 to re-do a perfectly good document.]

All ranting aside, though, the piece of the final critique section above that relates directly back to my original “burning question” is the part where the reviewer says “If your resume is not as strong as the top 10% then your chances of getting the interview are slim.”  This is the part I want my readers to think really hard about.  What does the phrase “top 10%” resume actually mean?  Does it mean that the resume layout is among the 10% most beautiful in existence?  Or that the copywriting of the piece is more compelling than that of 89% other resumes floating around out there?  Or does it suggest, instead, that the candidate herself is actually among the 10% most qualified people in the market for the specific types of jobs she’s seeking?

From my standpoint, it’s the latter factor that job hunters should be most focused on, not the former two.  Sure, you need a nice-looking resume that doesn’t have any obvious mistakes and that doesn’t undersell you by leaving out lots of the wonderful accomplishments you’ve realized over the years.  But beyond that, how much more room for improvement is there, really?  Perhaps the reason you’re not getting more interviews is not because of your resume format itself, but because you’re not sending out enough resumes to the right places, or following up assertively, or networking hard enough to find unpublished opportunities.  Or maybe it’s just the sheer competition level out there — or that you’ve allowed your skill sets to get a bit dusty compared to what employers are currently looking for in your field, in which case you’d be better served by taking that $399 and investing it in a professional development class of some kind.

Long story short, it ain’t usually the resume that’s the problem, folks!  You want to have a good one, for sure, but a great one?  I’m not sure a roomful of resume experts, recruiters, and hiring managers could even agree on what that definition means, exactly…

3 Responses to “Burning Question: Do Great Resumes Even Exist?”

  1. Rebecca Schwartz February 23, 2010 at 8:06 pm

    Hi Matt,

    I did the Jobfox resume review and I got nearly identical feedback to that which you quote above. While the feedback was pretty specific, it didn’t really align with my resume and also it was clear that the reviewer didn’t have any clue what my job entails. For example, she said that “design” and “develop” were really boring words to use to describe what I do, but it just so happens that I’m an instructional DESIGNER and those two words are phases in the most commonly used instructional design model, and they indicate a pretty standard set of tasks in my field.

    Some quotes:

    —Here’s the good news: my first impression of you is that you are off to a good start in your career. You’re an up and coming Senior Instructional Designer, with a lot to offer an employer. Now, here’s the bad news: your resume isn’t doing a good job saying that to an employer. I found it to be mundane and unlikely to catch an employer’s attention. If you were selling yourself as Crème Brulee, it’s as if your resume is saying “pudding in a cup”.

    —From the way the resume is worded, you come across as a “doer” not an “achiever.” Too many of your job descriptions are task based and not results based. Meaning they tell what you did, not what you achieved.

    —A great resume is the lynchpin in your job search, and I hate to see a strong person like you being underserved by something that’s so easy to fix.

    While I’m sure that there are aspects of my resume that I could improve, I know it’s relatively strong and would never consider investing in their services, unless it was for the amusement of re-submitting their revised resume back to them and getting the same feedback about it. That would be funny.


  2. Matt- You’re right on regarding all these different sites and resume services. I got one from jobfox, one from career builder,one from…you get the picture.
    Here’s the bottom line. The websites are in business to make money. One very important avenue to make money is through resume writing and resume blast services, both of which the vast majority of job hunters do not need, at least from these service providers! Job hunters would be better off follwing your advice.
    One thing I learned long ago- everyone has an opinion about resumes and how they should look and read, the amount of info, the number of pages, etc. It’s just their opinion-period. I think the best thing is to take many good pieces of advice for combined best thinking and construct a resume that meets a wide variety of opinions. And, be sure that your ‘above the fold’ area is appealing and compelling to entice further reading.

  3. Great post.

    I had my resume done by a professional – rather she helped me see what would make MY resume stand out so we kind of wrote it together. Excellent experience. Then, for grins because I had read about this resume critique by Jobfox because my friend was so upset by what they wrote to her.

    I got the same lengthy critique. The Ladders has the same critique as well.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: